From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Vivier Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:57:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4718C5E0.9000204@bull.net> References: <47189371.7080104@de.ibm.com> <4718B4DB.1000202@de.ibm.com> <200710191648.32157.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , carsteno@de.ibm.com, Mike Lampard , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aurelien Jarno , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200710191648.32157.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger a =E9crit : > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 schrieb Jan Engelhardt: >> On Oct 19 2007 15:44, Carsten Otte wrote: >>> Carsten Otte wrote: >>>> First thing we do, is figure whether or not 2.6.23.1 as released b= reaks our >>>> system too. This way, we can either focus on differences between L= inus and >>>> Avi, or turn on the big red warning sign saying "regression". >>> Looks like 2.6.23.1 works fine on that box. We'll leave it running = over >>> the weekend with "while true; do make; make clean; done". >> Well, do you happen to use sata_mv? >=20 > no, we have nvidia, so its sata_nv. Did you patch kvm.git with patch-2.6.23.1.bz2 or did you download=20 linux-2.6.23.1.tar.bz2 ? 2.6.23.1 corrects nothing except sata_mv... Laurent --=20 ---------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net ----------------- "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" E. S. Raymond