From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs (V2) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: <471C83D5.7070807@de.ibm.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC85EF74@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <471AF5BA.4010506@qumranet.com> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02440AE6@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> Reply-To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Zhang, Xiantao" , Avi Kivity To: "Dong, Eddie" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02440AE6-wq7ZOvIWXbNpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Dong, Eddie wrote: > Should fpu_active be X86 specific? Not sure about PPC & S390 (Hollis & > Carsten?), but for IA64 > it is catagoried into low fp & high fp. Our FPU is always "active", we restore FPU state on every context switch. We don't need that flag. Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/