Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs (V2)

[Anthony Liguori <anthony-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 22 October 2007, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>   
>> Should fpu_active be X86 specific? Not sure about PPC & S390 (Hollis &
>> Carsten?), but for IA64
>> it is catagoried into low fp & high fp.
>>     
>
> PPC can use that flag, on s390 it won't help.
>   

While both PPC and x86 may be able to use it, I doubt there will 
actually be common code that ever touches it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> 	Arnd <><
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/