From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs (V2) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:13:06 +0200 Message-ID: <471CBE02.5050500@qumranet.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC85EF74@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <471AF5BA.4010506@qumranet.com> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02440AE6@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> <200710221317.38961.arnd@arndb.de> <471CB6C9.6050207@codemonkey.ws> <471CB7C3.7020607@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Zhang, Xiantao" To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <471CB7C3.7020607-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Carsten Otte wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> While both PPC and x86 may be able to use it, I doubt there will >> actually be common code that ever touches it. >> > Common code could figure whether or not it needs to save/restore the > fpu register set, and call back to an arch specific callback to do so. > On the other hand, your argument is hard to disprove without actual > portability split of the code that works with the data structures. > > Let's not worry about it now. There are lots of low-hanging fruit on the portability tree, let's pick those first. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/