* [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs()
@ 2007-10-22 14:33 Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Vivier @ 2007-10-22 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f; +Cc: Laurent Vivier
This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and kvm-updates-2.6.25
as it needs smp_call_function_mask().
In kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), it replaces a loop using smp_call_function_single()
by a single call to smp_call_function_mask().
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c | 26 +++-----------------------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
index bf6a86c..6f7b31e 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -200,21 +200,15 @@ void vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void ack_flush(void *_completed)
{
- atomic_t *completed = _completed;
-
- atomic_inc(completed);
}
void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- int i, cpu, needed;
+ int i, cpu;
cpumask_t cpus;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- atomic_t completed;
- atomic_set(&completed, 0);
cpus_clear(cpus);
- needed = 0;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
vcpu = kvm->vcpus[i];
if (!vcpu)
@@ -223,23 +217,9 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
continue;
cpu = vcpu->cpu;
if (cpu != -1 && cpu != raw_smp_processor_id())
- if (!cpu_isset(cpu, cpus)) {
- cpu_set(cpu, cpus);
- ++needed;
- }
- }
-
- /*
- * We really want smp_call_function_mask() here. But that's not
- * available, so ipi all cpus in parallel and wait for them
- * to complete.
- */
- for (cpu = first_cpu(cpus); cpu != NR_CPUS; cpu = next_cpu(cpu, cpus))
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, ack_flush, &completed, 1, 0);
- while (atomic_read(&completed) != needed) {
- cpu_relax();
- barrier();
+ cpu_set(cpu, cpus);
}
+ smp_call_function_mask(cpus, ack_flush, NULL, 1);
}
int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
--
1.5.2.4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread[parent not found: <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> @ 2007-10-22 14:57 ` Dor Laor [not found] ` <471CBA60.2030402-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> 2007-10-22 15:24 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Avi Kivity 2007-10-22 16:24 ` Carsten Otte 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Dor Laor @ 2007-10-22 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Laurent Vivier wrote: > > This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and > kvm-updates-2.6.25 > as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). > > In kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), it replaces a loop using > smp_call_function_single() > by a single call to smp_call_function_mask(). > Would you be kind enough to copy the implementation of smp_call_function_mask into external_module_compat.h so older kernel's will still work after this commited. Thanks, Dor. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> > --- > drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c | 26 +++----------------------- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c > index bf6a86c..6f7b31e 100644 > --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -200,21 +200,15 @@ void vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static void ack_flush(void *_completed) > { > - atomic_t *completed = _completed; > - > - atomic_inc(completed); > } > > void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > { > - int i, cpu, needed; > + int i, cpu; > cpumask_t cpus; > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > - atomic_t completed; > > - atomic_set(&completed, 0); > cpus_clear(cpus); > - needed = 0; > for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) { > vcpu = kvm->vcpus[i]; > if (!vcpu) > @@ -223,23 +217,9 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm) > continue; > cpu = vcpu->cpu; > if (cpu != -1 && cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) > - if (!cpu_isset(cpu, cpus)) { > - cpu_set(cpu, cpus); > - ++needed; > - } > - } > - > - /* > - * We really want smp_call_function_mask() here. But that's not > - * available, so ipi all cpus in parallel and wait for them > - * to complete. > - */ > - for (cpu = first_cpu(cpus); cpu != NR_CPUS; cpu = > next_cpu(cpu, cpus)) > - smp_call_function_single(cpu, ack_flush, &completed, > 1, 0); > - while (atomic_read(&completed) != needed) { > - cpu_relax(); > - barrier(); > + cpu_set(cpu, cpus); > } > + smp_call_function_mask(cpus, ack_flush, NULL, 1); > } > > int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id) > -- > 1.5.2.4 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > kvm-devel mailing list > kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <471CBA60.2030402-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <471CBA60.2030402-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> @ 2007-10-22 15:02 ` Laurent Vivier [not found] ` <471CBB70.5050109-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Laurent Vivier @ 2007-10-22 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dor.laor-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Dor Laor a écrit : > Laurent Vivier wrote: >> This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and >> kvm-updates-2.6.25 >> as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). >> >> In kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), it replaces a loop using >> smp_call_function_single() >> by a single call to smp_call_function_mask(). >> > Would you be kind enough to copy the implementation of > smp_call_function_mask > into external_module_compat.h so older kernel's will still work after > this commited. Yes, I can, I think the best solution is to move the old KVM code using smp_function_call_single() to external_module_compat.h. Laurent -- ---------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org ----------------- "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" E. S. Raymond ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <471CBB70.5050109-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <471CBB70.5050109-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> @ 2007-10-22 15:11 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-22 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Laurent Vivier wrote: > Dor Laor a écrit : > >> Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >>> This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and >>> kvm-updates-2.6.25 >>> as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). >>> >>> In kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), it replaces a loop using >>> smp_call_function_single() >>> by a single call to smp_call_function_mask(). >>> >>> >> Would you be kind enough to copy the implementation of >> smp_call_function_mask >> into external_module_compat.h so older kernel's will still work after >> this commited. >> > > Yes, I can, I think the best solution is to move the old KVM code using > smp_function_call_single() to external_module_compat.h. > Agree, s_c_f_m() is too low-level to go into e_m_c.h. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> 2007-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Dor Laor @ 2007-10-22 15:24 ` Avi Kivity 2007-10-22 16:24 ` Carsten Otte 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-22 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Laurent Vivier wrote: > This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and kvm-updates-2.6.25 > as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). > > In kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), it replaces a loop using smp_call_function_single() > by a single call to smp_call_function_mask(). > > Thanks; I pulled from Linus and applied this on master as well. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org> 2007-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Dor Laor 2007-10-22 15:24 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-22 16:24 ` Carsten Otte [not found] ` <471CCEC8.9060200-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otte @ 2007-10-22 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurent Vivier; +Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Laurent Vivier wrote: > This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and kvm-updates-2.6.25 > as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). There's one thing I don't understand: How is this locked versus cpu hotplug? Isn't there an obvious race involved where a cpu unplugged after cpu_set()? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <471CCEC8.9060200-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <471CCEC8.9060200-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2007-10-22 17:05 ` Avi Kivity [not found] ` <471CD876.5020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-22 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Laurent Vivier Carsten Otte wrote: > Laurent Vivier wrote: > >> This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and kvm-updates-2.6.25 >> as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). >> > There's one thing I don't understand: How is this locked versus cpu > hotplug? Isn't there an obvious race involved where a cpu unplugged > after cpu_set()? > > A cpu unplug first evicts all tasks from the victim cpu. During this process, it calls kvm via a hotplug notifier, which notifier calls vcpu_clear() for all vcpus that are resident on that cpu. So after it runs, there won't be any vcpus on the dead cpu. The notifier is called from within stop_machine_run(), which ensures that no task is running on any cpu, so by the time the cpu is being unplugged, any concurrent call to kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() will have ended. It's a miracle that it works. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <471CD876.5020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <471CD876.5020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> @ 2007-10-22 18:36 ` Avi Kivity 2007-10-23 11:50 ` Carsten Otte 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-22 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Laurent Vivier Avi Kivity wrote: > Carsten Otte wrote: > >> Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> >>> This patches can be applied only on kvm-updates-2.6.24 and kvm-updates-2.6.25 >>> as it needs smp_call_function_mask(). >>> >>> >> There's one thing I don't understand: How is this locked versus cpu >> hotplug? Isn't there an obvious race involved where a cpu unplugged >> after cpu_set()? >> >> >> > > A cpu unplug first evicts all tasks from the victim cpu. During this > process, it calls kvm via a hotplug notifier, which notifier calls > vcpu_clear() for all vcpus that are resident on that cpu. So after it > runs, there won't be any vcpus on the dead cpu. > > The notifier is called from within stop_machine_run(), which ensures > that no task is running on any cpu, so by the time the cpu is being > unplugged, any concurrent call to kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() will have ended. > > It's a miracle that it works. > > Miracle indeed. We need to disable preemption in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), otherwise the whole story falls apart. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() [not found] ` <471CD876.5020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> 2007-10-22 18:36 ` Avi Kivity @ 2007-10-23 11:50 ` Carsten Otte 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Carsten Otte @ 2007-10-23 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity Cc: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA, Laurent Vivier, kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Avi Kivity wrote: > A cpu unplug first evicts all tasks from the victim cpu. During this > process, it calls kvm via a hotplug notifier, which notifier calls > vcpu_clear() for all vcpus that are resident on that cpu. So after it > runs, there won't be any vcpus on the dead cpu. > > The notifier is called from within stop_machine_run(), which ensures > that no task is running on any cpu, so by the time the cpu is being > unplugged, any concurrent call to kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() will have ended. > > It's a miracle that it works. Really interresting. I put it on the "neat code I want to read" list for long and dark winter evenings :-). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-23 11:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-22 14:33 [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <11930635871488-git-send-email-Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() inkvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Dor Laor
[not found] ` <471CBA60.2030402-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 15:02 ` Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <471CBB70.5050109-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 15:11 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-22 15:24 ` [PATCH] kvm uses smp_call_function_mask() in kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() Avi Kivity
2007-10-22 16:24 ` Carsten Otte
[not found] ` <471CCEC8.9060200-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <471CD876.5020404-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-10-22 18:36 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-23 11:50 ` Carsten Otte
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox