Re: userspace repositories

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>     
>>> Avi, what do you think about breaking the kvm-userspace repository into
>>> separate kvm-qemu, kvmctl, and libkvm repositories?
>>>       
>> Firstly, I think kvmctl and libkvm should stay together.
>>     
>
> Why? As far as I can see, there are currently two independent consumers
> of libkvm: qemu and kvmctl. At the very least they should live in
> separate directories.
>
>   

They're both small, and tied up together.  I'd rather support one small 
package than two small packages.

Agree about separate directories.

> Also, having libkvm on its own means that only one package has to
> include kernel headers and deal with that configure mess. The userspace
> apps really have no need for that...
>   

kvmctl is intended to be a small test driver, no more.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/