Re: RFC/patch portability: split kvm_vm_ioctl v3

Dong, Eddie
2007-10-30T11:35:22Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]

OK, so how can a device inform kernel for an IRQ in S390?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carsten Otte [mailto:cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org]
>Sent: 2007年10月30日 19:30
>To: Dong, Eddie
>Cc: Avi Kivity; Zhang, Xiantao; Hollis Blanchard;
>kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] RFC/patch portability: split kvm_vm_ioctl v3
>
>Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Why KVM_IRQ_LINE is X86b specific? The original idea are
>based on ACPI spec which
>> I assume to be generic though S390 may not take.
>ACPI is not present on s390 and ppc. In fact, I doubt it is present on
>any architecture except those two intel ones: at least my mips router
>and my arm pda don't have it either. It's kind of based on the idea of
>having a bios alike code.
>
>so long,
>Carsten
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org