RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

[Carsten Otte]

This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The
first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but
has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing
discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask for
integration of that one.
The other three patches require peer review. They move entire functions
blocks from kvm_main.c to x86.c. Xiantao and Hollis please make sure I
am not moving anything of interrest for your ports.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

Re: RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

[Hollis Blanchard]

On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The
> first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but
> has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing
> discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask for
> integration of that one.
> The other three patches require peer review. They move entire functions
> blocks from kvm_main.c to x86.c. Xiantao and Hollis please make sure I
> am not moving anything of interrest for your ports.

Patches 1-4:
Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

Re: RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

[Zhang, Xiantao]

Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability.
> The first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last
> submit, but has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more
> ongoing discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask
> for integration of that one.
> The other three patches require peer review. They move entire
> functions blocks from kvm_main.c to x86.c. Xiantao and Hollis please
> make sure I am not moving anything of interrest for your ports.

Good progress!  I didn't see the portions which block IA64 side. Please
go ahead! 
Thanks 
Xiantao 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

Re: RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

[Avi Kivity]

Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The
> first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but
> has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing
> discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask for
> integration of that one.
> The other three patches require peer review. They move entire functions
> blocks from kvm_main.c to x86.c. Xiantao and Hollis please make sure I
> am not moving anything of interrest for your ports.
>   

Applied all, thanks.

-- 
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/