From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:17:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4726A233.6010108@qumranet.com> References: <1193670506.7471.36.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org" , Hollis Blanchard , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: Carsten Otte Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1193670506.7471.36.camel-WIxn4w2hgUz3YA32ykw5MLlKpX0K8NHHQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Carsten Otte wrote: > This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The > first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but > has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing > discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask for > integration of that one. > The other three patches require peer review. They move entire functions > blocks from kvm_main.c to x86.c. Xiantao and Hollis please make sure I > am not moving anything of interrest for your ports. > Applied all, thanks. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/