From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: RFC/patch portability: split kvm_vm_ioctl v3 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:29:45 +0100 Message-ID: <472715A9.4050201@de.ibm.com> References: <1192192452.7630.16.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com><1193327325.8345.9.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1193400099.10970.8.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A024CEC4D@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com> Reply-To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Hollis Blanchard , "Zhang, Xiantao" , Avi Kivity To: "Dong, Eddie" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A024CEC4D-wq7ZOvIWXbNpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Dong, Eddie wrote: > Why KVM_IRQ_LINE is X86b specific? The original idea are based on ACPI spec which > I assume to be generic though S390 may not take. ACPI is not present on s390 and ppc. In fact, I doubt it is present on any architecture except those two intel ones: at least my mips router and my arm pda don't have it either. It's kind of based on the idea of having a bios alike code. so long, Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/