From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: RFC/patch 0/3 portability: please review Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:53:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4727A7D6.5010406@de.ibm.com> References: <1193766253.7800.43.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B5856@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Reply-To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Hollis Blanchard , Avi Kivity To: "Zhang, Xiantao" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC8B5856-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Basically, It doesn't impact our side. For patch 2/3, we had better find > an approach to handle mmio-realted functions, becasue they may exist in > most archs. > For IA64, if this move happens, we have to duplicate them in IA64 side. Thanks for your feedback. This matches Hollis' view, I'll try to rework that patch. We're really the only platform without mmio, that's a s390 special case. I'll leave it in common and find a way around for s390. cheers, Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/