From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] More x86 code movement Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:08:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4729CFB3.5070206@qumranet.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Hollis Blanchard Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hollis Blanchard wrote: > More straightforward code movement from kvm_main.c to x86.c. > These patches have been build-tested on x86-32, but not run. > > = Patches are good, but I get > drivers/kvm/vmx.c: In function =91vmx_vcpu_put=92: > drivers/kvm/vmx.c:534: error: implicit declaration of function = > =91kvm_put_guest_fpu=92 > drivers/kvm/x86.c: In function =91__vcpu_run=92: > drivers/kvm/x86.c:1852: error: implicit declaration of function = > =91kvm_load_guest_fpu=92 > drivers/kvm/x86.c: At top level: > drivers/kvm/x86.c:2306: warning: conflicting types for = > =91kvm_load_guest_fpu=92 > drivers/kvm/x86.c:1852: warning: previous implicit declaration of = > =91kvm_load_guest_fpu=92 was here on x86_64. The problem's only in the last patch, so I dropped it and applied the = other three. -- = Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/