From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] kvm-52 release Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:00:20 +0200 Message-ID: <473967A4.9080400@qumranet.com> References: <47384377.70004@qumranet.com> <47387146.706@bppiac.hu> <1194882388.3983.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47387A44.3090604@bppiac.hu> <1194884867.3161.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <473883C4.8040405@bppiac.hu> <473888D5.20603@cisco.com> <4738B51C.1080606@bppiac.hu> <47395AAA.1020803@qumranet.com> <473965F5.7070105@bppiac.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , david ahern To: Farkas Levente Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473965F5.7070105-lWVWdrzSO4GHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Farkas Levente wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Farkas Levente wrote: >> >>> david ahern wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Can you post the full qemu command that gets launched in each case? >>>> >>>> >>> this is the current running one, the only difference when smp set is -smp 4: >>> >>> root 3270 10.3 25.8 2213976 2111868 ? Sl 16:20 30:35 >>> /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -M pc -m 2048 -smp 1 -monitor pty -boot c -hda >>> /dev/VolGroup00/centos-i386-root -hdb /dev/VolGroup00/centos-i386-swap >>> -hdc /dev/md2 -net nic,macaddr=00:16:3e:58:66:7b,vlan=0 -net >>> tap,fd=11,script=,vlan=0 -usb -vnc 127.0.0.1:0 >>> >>> >>> >> Well, you're not running kvm-52 userspace then. You're running Fedora's >> kvm package (unless you renamed /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 to >> /usr/bin/qemu-kvm). >> > > i running kvm-52 userspace. i build the rpm based on centos and fedora > spec file (which eventually rename it to qemu-kvm). belive me these rpm > are the latest compiled by myself from the latest kvm-52.tar.gz on a > fully updated centos x86_64. > Ah, okay. > is there any way how can i prove it? may be a command line option for > qemu -version would be useful. > > Checking the file date should be enough. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/