Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvmclock - the host part.

[Izik Eidus <izike-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dong, Eddie escreveu:
>   
>>> +static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{
>>> +	struct timespec ts;
>>> +	int r;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!vcpu->clock_gpa)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Updates version to the next odd number, indicating
>>> we're writing */
>>> +	vcpu->hv_clock.version++;
>>> +	kvm_write_guest(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->clock_gpa,
>>> &vcpu->hv_clock, PAGE_SIZE);
>>> +
>>> +	kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_TIME_STAMP_COUNTER,
>>> +			  &vcpu->hv_clock.last_tsc);
>>> +
>>> +	ktime_get_ts(&ts);
>>>       
>> Do we need to disable preemption here?
>>     
> After thinking for a little while, you are theoretically right.
> In the current state, we could even be preempted between all operations
> ;-) Maybe after avi's suggestion of moving the call to it it will end up
> in a preempt safe region, but anyway, it's safer to add the preempt
> markers here.
> I'll put it in next version, thanks
>   
note that you cant call to kvm_write_guest with preemption disabled 
(witch you do few lines below)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/