Re: [PATCH] 3/5 Using kvm arch support instead of kvm_x86_ops

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Carsten Otte wrote:
> I still do strongly agree with the general idea of this patch, and 
> most of the split comes out just right now. However, there is one 
> thing I'd like to pick on:
>
> decache_vcpus_on_cpu should be an arch callback, and rather than 
> kvm_arch_vcpu_decache. There's no reason for s390 to grab locks and do 
> the arch callback in a loop. The whole thing is nop for us, thus the 
> whole thing should be a callback.
>
> I'd really like to see this changed before the patch gets merged.

Xiantao, can you address this?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/