From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3/5 Using kvm arch support instead of kvm_x86_ops Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:35:17 +0200 Message-ID: <473AF995.9000006@qumranet.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC94FACA@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <473AE1A9.3010501@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Hollis Blanchard , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473AE1A9.3010501-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Carsten Otte wrote: > I still do strongly agree with the general idea of this patch, and > most of the split comes out just right now. However, there is one > thing I'd like to pick on: > > decache_vcpus_on_cpu should be an arch callback, and rather than > kvm_arch_vcpu_decache. There's no reason for s390 to grab locks and do > the arch callback in a loop. The whole thing is nop for us, thus the > whole thing should be a callback. > > I'd really like to see this changed before the patch gets merged. Xiantao, can you address this? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/