From: Anthony Liguori <anthony-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Ryden <markryde-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: para virtualized kvm virtio drivers and performance comparing to Xen
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:55:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4740606D.4050401@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac45060711180516l501b2cfaq8999589a798e0739-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Mark Ryden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw in this mailing list (kvm-devel) that there is a git tree
> which uses Rusty Russel virtio API. The intention that this tree will be
> integrated inot mainstream in the near future.
>
> (for example,
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org/msg08854.html).
>
> My question is about performance of these virtio para virtualized
> drivers (I am talking mainly about network and disk drivers):
> How this is in comparison with the paravirtualized drivers of Xen
> (the split devices model)?
>
Optimization is still ongoing. I'm pretty confident that the linux-aio
based disk driver is at least as good. The RX side of the network
driver is also pretty decent (I can get 1.5 gbit/sec). I think over
time we'll be able to get a fair bit more without even going to
kernel-space. Once we have a kernel space backend, I think we'll get
performance that's at least as good as Xen's drivers.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> I am talking about Xen in its paravirtualized mode, where the
> guests run unmodified OSes (on ordinary, non virtualized processors).
>
> Is the performance about the same as the Xen paravirtualized drivers ?
>
> In case is it so, can we see kvm a competitor to Xen in server virtualization
> (when we deal with a high loads of thousands/ten of thousands of
> interrupts per second).?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-18 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-18 13:16 para virtualized kvm virtio drivers and performance comparing to Xen Mark Ryden
[not found] ` <dac45060711180516l501b2cfaq8999589a798e0739-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-18 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4740606D.4050401@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony-rdkfgonbjusknkdkm+me6a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=markryde-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox