From: Carsten Otte <cotte-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/3] Move kvm_vcpu_iotcl_get_dirty_log to arch
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:39:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4741A011.2080405@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC9A0A7D-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Move kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_dirty_log to arch, and still keep the interface
> in common.
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 45b18e1..3400265 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -419,19 +419,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
return kvm_set_memory_region(kvm, mem, user_alloc);
}
-/*
- * Get (and clear) the dirty memory log for a memory slot.
- */
-static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct kvm_dirty_log *log)
+int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_dirty_log *log, int *is_dirty)
Any reason to remove that comment? It looks helpful to me.
{
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
int r, i;
int n;
unsigned long any = 0;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-
r = -EINVAL;
if (log->slot >= KVM_MEMORY_SLOTS)
goto out;
@@ -450,17 +445,11 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm
*kvm,
if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, memslot->dirty_bitmap, n))
goto out;
- /* If nothing is dirty, don't bother messing with page tables. */
- if (any) {
- kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(kvm, log->slot);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
- memset(memslot->dirty_bitmap, 0, n);
- }
+ if (any)
+ *is_dirty = 1;
r = 0;
-
out:
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
return r;
}
This split won't work on s390. I think kvm_get_dirty_log should be
arch dependent alltogether: we're not going to have a dirty bitmap on
s390, we rather rely on our hardware support to update our storage
keys accordingly without guest/host intervention required. We'd want
to use that, and thus this implementation of kvm_get_dirty_log makes
no sense for us. On the other hand, I'd really want to keep the ioctl
common, so that guest migration code in userland can be common for all
archs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 5:35 [PATCH][1/3] Move kvm_vcpu_iotcl_get_dirty_log to arch Zhang, Xiantao
[not found] ` <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC9A0A7D-wq7ZOvIWXbMAbVU2wMM1CrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-19 14:39 ` Carsten Otte [this message]
[not found] ` <4741A011.2080405-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-19 14:52 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4741A322.8040201-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-19 14:55 ` Carsten Otte
[not found] ` <4741A3FE.70908-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-19 14:59 ` Carsten Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4741A011.2080405@de.ibm.com \
--to=cotte-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox