From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Struct kvm split Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4742B12A.2020002@qumranet.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC9A0C2B@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1195500535.5359.66.camel@basalt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, "Zhang, Xiantao" To: Hollis Blanchard Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1195500535.5359.66.camel@basalt> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hollis Blanchard wrote: > I was very confused until I realized you're only dealing with struct > kvm, not struct kvm_vcpu. I actually started the kvm_vcpu work last > week, and it is a much larger patch. :) > It can be probably done in parts with members moved off to x86-land incrementally. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/