Re: KVM Test result, kernel 51727a1.. , userspace 6a385c9..

Dong, Eddie
2007-12-06T13:29:04Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>[mailto:kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
>Izik Eidus
>Sent: 2007年12月6日 19:27
>To: Avi Kivity
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel 51727a1..
>,userspace 6a385c9..
>
>Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Izik Eidus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a
>>>>> platform related issue.
>>>>> Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period
>>>>> the installation test could pass without any problem.
>>>>> But after we switched the test machine to Dempsey/Woodcrest, the
>>>>> installation test always fails.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It seems to be related to hardware tpr threshold support, but I'm
>>>> not 100% certain.
>>>>
>>> why do you think so?
>>> tests that i did showed that (at least one of the problems) is in
>>> other place
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I disabled hardware tpr threshold, and it worked.
>>
>>
>ok, please let me know when you are 100% sure it is,
>i wasted alot of time for this bug
>

How do u disable TPR? Remove the patch, or just remove the setting?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org