From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: [PATCH]0/2 Patches to furthure split kvm_init Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:49:25 +0100 Message-ID: <475006D5.9060504@de.ibm.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDCA394B2@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <474E8D88.4090508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <474FBF0D.7020601@qumranet.com> <474FF970.9060404@de.ibm.com> <474FFA26.6020302@qumranet.com> Reply-To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Christian Ehrhardt , hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, "Zhang, Xiantao" , kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <474FFA26.6020302-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > But you do need the vcpu cache, right? I think about organizing our SIE control blocks in it, just like vmx and svm do with their hardware structures backing a vcpu state. They're 512 bytes in size, and need to start on a 512-byte boundary. Sorry about my previous answer, I was confused by vcpu_cache / vcpu_decache for x86. It's friday... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4