From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: How to handle kvm-abi-10 case for other archs. Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:16:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4756B2D9.3010909@qumranet.com> References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDCA39867@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <47513308.9020407@qumranet.com> <20071204184939.GA10466@tapir> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, "Zhang, Xiantao" , Hollis Blanchard , Jeremy Katz To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071204184939.GA10466@tapir> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: >> #ifdef is okay for this. Actually we can probably remove abi 10 support >> since the F7 kernel now supports the modern ABI (I don't think anybody >> else uses abi 10, which is pre 2.6.22 when we announced ABI compatibility. >> > > ubuntu feisty uses kernel 2.6.20 and is packaging kvm-16 : > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/misc/kvm > kvm only started the ABI guarantee in 2.6.22. Anyway this will only hit people trying to run kvm-56+ userspace atop 2.6.20, which is fairly ridiculous in terms of how far kvm went in that time. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4