From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: KVM Test result, kernel 51727a1.. ,
	userspace 6a385c9..
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:21:54 +0200
Message-ID: <4756B402.3030106@qumranet.com>
References: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A0269FC7F@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com>	<474B0116.5030404@qumranet.com>
	<10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02126025@pdsmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02126025-wq7ZOvIWXbNpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>   =

>>> One regression:
>>> 1. Cannot install 64bit vista guests.
>>>
>>>       =

>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=DEtail&atid=893831&aid=1836905&gro=
up_id=1805
>> 99
>>     =

>> Internal testing here confirms, but this is not a recent regression.
>> When was the last time Vista x64 installed reliably for you? (here, it
>> works, but not 100% of the time).
>>     =

> [Yunfeng] Yes, it may not be a recent regression, and it may be a platfor=
m related issue.
> Before we used Harwitch /paxville to do the test, and in a period the ins=
tallation test could pass without any problem.
> But after we switched the test machine to Dempsey/Woodcrest, the installa=
tion test always fails.
>
>   =


It seems to be related to hardware tpr threshold support, but I'm not =

100% certain.

-- =

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4