From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:16:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4761066D.6030809@de.ibm.com>
References: <475E5CBB.9080608@qumranet.com> <20071211151143.GA7751@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <475EB23E.1060002@qumranet.com> <200712120014.43314.arnd@arndb.de> <4760EE69.2090006@qumranet.com>
Reply-To: carsteno@de.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1760680AbXLMKQn@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4760EE69.2090006@qumranet.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Avi Kivity wrote:
> In the case of x86, we'll have 16 arch dependent files (i8259.[ch], 
> irq.[ch], lapic.c, mmu.c, paging_tmpl.[ch], svm.[ch], vmx.[ch], 
> x86.[ch], x86_emulate.[ch]) which warrant a kvm/ subdirectory IMO.
I think a subdirectory makes sense too. We'll end up with more than a 
single file.