Re: [PATCH] VMX: inject high priority interrupts first

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 774 bytes --]

Dong, Eddie wrote:
> This is not necessary, vector doesn;t mean priority.
>
> Remember I ever had a talk with Avi that user level irqchip could only support
> one vector pending in kernel like you mentioned too. On the other hand,
> if we have multiple pending vectors, we will lose priority. The point here
> is that vector doesn;t stand for priority for example slave PIC has higher priority
> than IRQ3-7 of master PIC. Using ffs or fls doesn;t matter here.
>
>   

Yes.

> But I think we'd better clean the code to just use pending_vector instead
> of bitmap to reduce those kind of unnecessary bit scan/set/clear etc.
>   

That's my plan; use a pending vector and put it in subarch independent code.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel