From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH vmx.c: add printk_ratelimit in vmx_intr_assist
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:30:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4767F5BF.8000501@qumranet.com>
References: <20071213162110.GJ23913@us.ibm.com>
	<476296A4.2010407@qumranet.com>	<20071214153527.GK23913@us.ibm.com>
	<20071214221359.GO23913@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071214221359.GO23913-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Ryan Harper <ryanh-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> [2007-12-14 09:36]:
>   
>> * Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> [2007-12-14 08:49]:
>>     
>>> Ryan Harper wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Add printk_ratelimit check in front of printk.  This prevents spamming
>>>> of the message during 32-bit ubuntu 6.06server install.  Previously, it
>>>> would hang during the partition formatting stage.
>>>>  
>>>>         
>>> Applied, but this is worrying.  Do you know whether this is a regression?
>>>       
>> I'll try out older releases to see if we did regress.
>>     
>
> Looks like kvm-47 introduced the hang during format, -46 finishes the
> format just fine and with no printk spamming.  I'll start seeing
> if I can bisect down to a particular changeset.
>
>   
Unfortunately there was a window where interrupts were injected outside 
the critical section, causing these errors.  This was introduced in 
kvm-47, so this doesn't help much.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace