From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] KVM shadow scalability enhancements Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:46:14 +0200 Message-ID: <476D6986.70301@qumranet.com> References: <20071221001821.029994250@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071221001821.029994250-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > The following patchset increases KVM shadow scalability by allowing concurrent > guest walking, allocation and instruction emulation. > Thanks; the split patchset it _much_ easier to review, and hopefully to bisect in case the review misses something. I believe we can merge it at the next iteration. Have you tested a real workload (like kernel compiles), for stability and performance? I can test Windows in case you don't have a copy handy. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/