From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Izik Eidus Subject: Re: kvm-59 doesn't work Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:16:55 +0200 Message-ID: <478A5597.2020007@qumranet.com> References: <20080113162751.GA20663@basil.nowhere.org> <478A3F87.6040509@qumranet.com> <478A47E4.8020109@codemonkey.ws> <20080113175922.GA4002@one.firstfloor.org> <478A53BB.30308@qumranet.com> <20080113181704.GA4196@one.firstfloor.org> <478A56BF.8020507@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Andi Kleen To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <478A56BF.8020507-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: >>> Are you using the modules that come with kvm or from an upstream >>> kernel? (which?) >>> >> >> kvm from 2.6.24-rc5-gitXXX upstream kernels (see my original mail) > > This points the finger at the memory allocation backward compatibility > logic. > > Izik, can you take a look there? > > yes i will look on this tomorrow (as i said) (what weird about it that the new code is actualy protected by: kvm_qemu_check_extension(KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY) call, so it shouldnt run i will see it tomorrow. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace