From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: swapping with MMU Notifiers V2 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: <479F5FBF.40203@de.ibm.com> References: <20080129145021.GJ7233@v2.random> <479F50D6.4020005@de.ibm.com> <479F532C.1020503@qumranet.com> <20080129165219.GN7233@v2.random> Reply-To: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carsteno-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Avi Kivity To: Andrea Arcangeli Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080129165219.GN7233-lysg2Xt5kKMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Well I already moved that bit to x86, at least that had a good reason > for being moved there, it's really invisible code to s390. The memslot > are all but invisible to s390 instead, and so the locking rules of the > memslots should be common as long as memslots remains a common-code > data structure too IMHO. That makes sense to me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/