From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [ToDo] Real Mode Support Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <47AEE385.7030306@qumranet.com> References: <20080206083326.43005755@frecb000711> <47A9EF21.3050103@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Guillaume Thouvenin To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47A9EF21.3050103@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > So what we would like to do, is instead of setting up vm86 mode for the > guest to execute real mode, use x86_emulate() to just emulate the code. > This means that we wouldn't be using the "vmlaunch" instruction when in > real mode and instead would be doing an x86_emulate() loop. > As using the emulator is likely to be slower than VT, we can call the emulator only if we are in a "VT unfriendly" state, so the code might look like if (vmx->rmode.active && big_real_mode(vmx)) ... In addition, there are some protected-mode states that VT can't handle (cs.rpl != ss.rpl IIRC) so we can emulate those cases as well. To improve speed, we may want to emulate >1 instruction per iteration. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/