From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Winkelbauer <andreas.winkelbauer@gmx.at>
Subject: bug/typo in vbetables-gen.c?
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:19:44 +0100
Message-ID: <47BB0FB0.9010700@gmx.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

hi,

is there a specific reason why the 1280x960 resolutions have two mode 
numbers (one being an exact duplicate of the other) in vbetables-gen.c 
(0x180 = 0x182, 0x181 = 0x183, see below)?

...
{ 1280, 960, 24                      , 0x180},
{ 1280, 960, 32                      , 0x181},
{ 1280, 960, 24                      , 0x182},
{ 1280, 960, 32                      , 0x183},
...

and is there a reason why those "new" modes weren't added in vbe.h too?

bye,
Andi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/