Re: [PATCH] kvm: sparse fixes for kvm/x86.c

[Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>]

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> In two case statements, use the ever popular 'i' instead of index:
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1063:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1079:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here
>
> Missing semicolon.
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:493:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
>
> Make it static.
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1945:24: warning: symbol 'emulate_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Drop the return statements.
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2878:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2944:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
>   

Applied all three patches, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/