From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] KVM: add basic paravirt support (v2) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:31:33 +0200 Message-ID: <47BDC385.1000104@qumranet.com> References: <20080220194720.750258362@harmony.lab.boston.redhat.com> <20080220195019.552114916@harmony.lab.boston.redhat.com> <47BD9AF6.7020206@qumranet.com> <20080221155530.GA30590@dmt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080221155530.GA30590@dmt> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > One ioctl per feature sounded like unnecessary code duplication. I have > no problems with it though. So you prefer that way? > Yes. I think we can avoid code duplication. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/