From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/15] mark processors as presents
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:33:57 +0200
Message-ID: <47C13A05.5090607@qumranet.com>
References: <1203716079-4872-1-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>	<1203716079-4872-2-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>	<1203716079-4872-3-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>	<1203716079-4872-4-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>
	<1203716079-4872-5-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, marcelo@kvack.org,
	chrisw@sous-sol.org
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1203716079-4872-5-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Glauber Costa wrote:
> mark processors as present through the _STA method
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> ---
>  bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> index e900795..cd42e23 100755
> --- a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> +++ b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
> @@ -25,9 +25,28 @@ DefinitionBlock (
>      0x1                 // OEM Revision
>      )
>  {
> +   Scope (\_PR)
> +   {
> +        Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU1, 0x01, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU2, 0x02, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU3, 0x03, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU4, 0x04, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU5, 0x05, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU6, 0x06, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU7, 0x07, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU8, 0x08, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPU9, 0x09, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUA, 0x0a, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUB, 0x0b, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUC, 0x0c, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUD, 0x0d, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +        Processor (CPUE, 0x0e, 0x0000b010, 0x06) {Method (_STA) { Return(0x1)}}
> +    }
>   

There is now code in rombios32.c to do this.  It needs to be removed.  
See acpi_build_processor_ssdt().

>  
>      Scope (\)
>      {
> +
>          /* CMOS memory access */
>          OperationRegion (CMS, SystemIO, 0x70, 0x02)
>          Field (CMS, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
>   

-

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/