public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, chrisw@sous-sol.org,
	Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] RFC: vcpu pinning at qemu start
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:35:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CE3136.9010605@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CDA2D8.7060709@codemonkey.ws>

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>> My main interest is in management tools being able to specify pinning
>> set ups at VM creation time.
>>
>> As I said, it can be done through tools like taskset, but then you'd 
>> have to know:
>>  * when are the threads created
>>  * which thread ids corresponds to each cpu
>>
>> And of course, for an amount of time, the threads will be running in 
>> a "wrong" cpu, which may affect workloads running there. (which is a 
>> case cpu pinning usually tries to address)
>
> A management tool can start QEMU with -S to prevent any CPUs from 
> running, query the VCPU=>thread id relationship (modifying info cpus 
> would be a good thing to do for this), taskset, and then run 'cont' in 
> the monitor if they desperately need this functionality.  However, I 
> don't think the vast majority of people need this particular 
> functionality.
>


Affinity control is probably useful mostly for numa configurations, 
where you want to restrict virtual cpus to run on the cores closest to 
memory.  However it may well be that the scheduler is already good 
enough to do this on its own.


> My feeling is that adding an interface to do this in QEMU encourages 
> people to not use the existing Linux tools for this or worse yet, to 
> think they can do a better job than Linux.  The whole reason this 
> exists in Xen is that Xen's schedulers were incapable of doing CPU 
> migration historically (which is no longer true since the credit 
> scheduler).  It was necessary to specify pinning upon creation or you 
> were stuck with round-robin placement.  So libvirt has APIs for this 
> because they were part of the Xen API because it was needed to get 
> reasonable performance at some point in time on Xen.  I don't think 
> this behavior is useful for KVM though.  Just because Xen does it 
> doesn't imply that we should do it.
>

In the brutal world of hypervisors, if your competitor has a feature, 
you must have it too.  I often get asked about cpu pinning in kvm.

[I'd like to see how Xen implements swapping, though]

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-05  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-04 16:21 [PATCH 0/8] RFC: vcpu pinning at qemu start Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] add thread id to vcpu structure Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21   ` [PATCH 2/8] provide a gettid function Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21     ` [PATCH 3/8] get thread id at thread's creation Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21       ` [PATCH 4/8] store and set cpu affinities Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21         ` [PATCH 5/8] initialize affinities Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:21           ` [PATCH 6/8] stabilish default affinity for newly created cpus Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:22             ` [PATCH 7/8] process a cpu affinity mask Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 16:22               ` [PATCH 8/8] provide -cpu-map option Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 17:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] RFC: vcpu pinning at qemu start Joerg Roedel
2008-03-04 18:11   ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 18:19     ` Joerg Roedel
2008-03-04 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-04 18:10   ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 19:28     ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-04 19:42       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-03-04 20:00         ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-04 19:59       ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-05  3:43         ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-05  6:44           ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-05 13:10           ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-05  5:35       ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-03-05 14:29         ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-05  5:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-05 13:13   ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47CE3136.9010605@qumranet.com \
    --to=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox