From: Izik Eidus <izike@qumranet.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shrinker support for the mmu cache
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:32:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D867FD.3050302@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D832DB.9020209@codemonkey.ws>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Izik Eidus wrote:
>> this patch simply register the mmu cache with the shrinker.
>
> Please inline patches in the future as it makes it easier to review.
I knew this time will come when ppl will force me to send patchs inline
(will happen next time )... :)
> The implementation looks good and I think it's a good idea.
>
> One is that there is one shrinker for all VMs but you run through the
> list of VMs in order. This means the first VM in the list is most
> frequently going to be shrunk down to KVM_MIN_ALLOC_MMU_PAGES. This
> seems unfair and potentially dangerous. The shrinker can be triggered
> potentially by the growth of the MMU cache on other VMs.
>
> I think in the least, you should attempt to go through the VMs in a
> round-robin fashion to ensure that if you shrink one VM, the next time
> you'll shrink a different VM.
you are 100% right, i will do that.
>
> The other thing I wonder about is whether DEFAULT_SEEKS is the best
> value to use. On the one hand, a guest page fault is probably not as
> expensive as reclaiming something from disk. On the other hand, NPT
> guests are likely to be very sensitive to evicting things from the
> shadow page cache. I would think it's pretty clear that in the NPT
> case, the MMU cache should have a higher seek cost than the default.
let me look at this, i think you have a case
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kvm-devel mailing list
>> kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 18:13 [PATCH] shrinker support for the mmu cache Izik Eidus
2008-03-12 19:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-12 23:32 ` Izik Eidus [this message]
2008-03-12 22:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-12 23:23 ` Izik Eidus
2008-03-13 21:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-16 11:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-17 13:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-17 14:41 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-17 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-18 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D867FD.3050302@qumranet.com \
--to=izike@qumranet.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox