From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: how increase performance of network io in kvm Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:55:18 -0500 Message-ID: <47DA9FE6.8020504@codemonkey.ws> References: <4d56c4330803101158x16fc9b87q4b332263f74cc0@mail.gmail.com> <59abf66e0803101213h2ce5b153k2bd2e71d5c329a2d@mail.gmail.com> <1205188633.3249.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4d56c4330803111358sfcb1439na92f8f2bd0d74555@mail.gmail.com> <59abf66e0803111403s54055cbey2614d2669a677af5@mail.gmail.com> <4d56c4330803111530m177137b4q2176f93a2f93a778@mail.gmail.com> <1205315218.3204.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4d56c4330803140826k401a14e3k939036597bd72124@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Dhirendra Pal Singh Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4d56c4330803140826k401a14e3k939036597bd72124@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Dhirendra Pal Singh wrote: > I got the latest snapshot of qemu and sure enough there was e1000 > driver support in it.. Though I didn't see much difference between > RealTek Driver Vs e1000... > Following was the test result... > > Copying 1GB file > real 3m48.284s > user 0m0.072s > sys 0m8.609s You won't see much of a performance improvement unless you're using tap instead of usernet. Regards, Anthony Liguori ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/