From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 14/15] guest: detect when running on kvm
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:37:19 +0100
Message-ID: <47E2CAFF.3070203@de.ibm.com>
References: <1206028710.6690.21.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
	<1206030326.6690.65.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
	<20080320175357.GA30959@infradead.org>
Reply-To: carsteno@de.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <EHRHARDT@de.ibm.com>, arnd@arndb.de,
	hollisb@us.ibm.com, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jeroney@us.ibm.com, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	borntrae@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rvdheij@gmail.com,
	Olaf Schnapper <os@de.ibm.com>, jblunck@suse.de,
	"Zhang,  Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080320175357.GA30959@infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi
>>  	/* Running on a P/390 ? */
>>  	if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.machine == 0x7490)
>>  		machine_flags |= 4;
>> +
>> +	/* Running under KVM ? */
>> +	if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.version == 0xfe)
>> +		machine_flags |= 64;
> 
> Shouldn't these have symbolic names?
You mean symbolics for machine_flags? Or symbolics for cpu ids?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/