From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 14/15] guest: detect when running on kvm
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:12:04 +0100
Message-ID: <47E39804.4030605@de.ibm.com>
References: <1206028710.6690.21.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
	<1206030326.6690.65.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
	<20080320175357.GA30959@infradead.org>
	<47E2CAFF.3070203@de.ibm.com> <20080320194137.GA9975@infradead.org>
	<47E2D034.4090600@de.ibm.com>
	<20080320212255.GA4225@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Reply-To: carsteno@de.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: carsteno@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Christian Ehrhardt <EHRHARDT@de.ibm.com>, arnd@arndb.de,
	hollisb@us.ibm.com, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jeroney@us.ibm.com, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, borntrae@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rvdheij@gmail.com, Olaf Schnapper <os@de.ibm.com>, jblunck@suse.de,
	"Zhang,  Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080320212255.GA4225@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

MAILER-DAEMON@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits?
> It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers
> we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time
> to time... but that didn't hurt enough yet, obviously.
> But now that you volunteered to take care of this... :)
Right. We only have defines for (machine_flags & bit). Looks to me 
like the bits really should have a name on them. I've created a patch 
that does this, but I want to talk it over with Martin before sending 
that one out.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/