From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Ryota OZAKI <ozaki.ryota@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: question: HPET for multiple VMs
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:56:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E580A2.4060308@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e93dcec0803220916m2069591bx617975ce96fb638c@mail.gmail.com>
Ryota OZAKI wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Current kvm allows only one VM to use HPET. Is
> there a plan to implement a functionality to
> allow multiple VMs to use HPET? If so, how
> about the status of that?
>
>
If you use the dyntick clock option (the default, IIRC), and a newer
host kernel, then the kernel provides high-resolution timers, very
likely using HPET internally or some other high resolution clock and
event source.
> And I would like to ask right and wrong to
> implement the functionality in terms of need
> and efficiency (scalability and time accuracy).
I think that for newer kernels we already have the desired accuracy.
We're not always good at exploiting that accuracy; hence the recent
movement of the PIT implementation from userspace to the kernel. But
recent discussion leads me to believe it could have been implemented
with the userspace PIT as well.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-22 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-22 16:16 question: HPET for multiple VMs Ryota OZAKI
2008-03-22 21:56 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-03-23 1:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-03-23 8:30 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-23 9:03 ` Dor Laor
2008-03-23 15:32 ` Ryota OZAKI
2008-03-23 22:33 ` Dor Laor
2008-03-24 6:31 ` Ryota OZAKI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E580A2.4060308@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ozaki.ryota@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox