From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] QEMU/KVM: add function to handle signals Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <47EBBC60.1050607@qumranet.com> References: <20080327150906.699073229@localhost.localdomain> <20080327151016.860749563@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080327151016.860749563@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > SIGUSR1 has no handler, and the SIGUSR2 one does nothing useful anymore > (thats also true for SIGIO on tap fd, which runs host_alarm_handler > unnecessarily). > The sigaction(); sa.sa_handler() stuff was added as a stopgap; do we actually need to run _any_ signal handlers? I think that main_loop_wait() does all that's necessary. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace