From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: SMP test
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:03:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47f9b150-c0fd-e497-7ee5-5c138f9b48fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190920080356.1948-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 20.09.19 10:03, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Testing SIGP emulation for the following order codes:
> * start
> * stop
> * restart
> * set prefix
> * store status
> * stop and store status
> * reset
> * initial reset
> * external call
> * emegergency call
>
> restart and set prefix are part of the library and needed to start
> other cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/smp.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 s390x/smp.c
>
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index d83dd0b..3744372 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/cpumodel.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/skrf.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/smp.elf
> tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>
> all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7032494
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
> +/*
> + * Tests sigp emulation
> + *
> + * Copyright 2019 IBM Corp.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
> + */
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/sigp.h>
> +
> +#include <smp.h>
> +#include <alloc_page.h>
> +
> +static int testflag = 0;
> +
> +static void cpu_loop(void)
> +{
> + for (;;) {}
> +}
> +
> +static void test_func(void)
> +{
> + testflag = 1;
> + mb();
> + cpu_loop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_start(void)
> +{
> + struct psw psw;
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> + while (!testflag) {
> + mb();
> + }
> + report("start", 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stop(void)
> +{
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> + /*
> + * The smp library waits for the CPU to shut down, but let's
> + * also do it here, so we don't rely on the library
> + * implementation
> + */
> + while (!smp_cpu_stopped(1)) {}
> + report("stop", 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stop_store_status(void)
> +{
> + struct cpu *cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(1);
> + struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("stop store status");
> + lc->prefix_sa = 0;
> + lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
> + smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
> + mb();
> + report("prefix", lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore);
> + report("stack", lc->grs_sa[15]);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_status(void)
> +{
> + struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(1);
> + uint32_t r;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("store status at address");
> + memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("running");
> + smp_cpu_restart(1);
> + sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, &r);
> + report("incorrect state", r == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE);
> + report("status not written", !memcmp(status, (void*)status + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE));
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> + report_prefix_push("stopped");
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> + sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
> + while (!status->prefix) { mb(); }
> + report("status written", 1);
> + free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void ecall(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask;
> + struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> + expect_ext_int();
> + ctl_set_bit(0, 13);
> + mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
> + load_psw_mask(mask);
> + testflag = 1;
> + while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
> + report("ecall", 1);
> + testflag= 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_ecall(void)
> +{
> + struct psw psw;
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("ecall");
> + testflag= 0;
> + smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> +
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> + while (!testflag) { mb(); }
> + testflag= 0;
> + sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
> + while(!testflag) {mb();}
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void emcall(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask;
> + struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> + expect_ext_int();
> + ctl_set_bit(0, 14);
> + mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
> + load_psw_mask(mask);
> + testflag= 1;
> + while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
> + report("ecall", 1);
> + testflag = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_emcall(void)
> +{
> + struct psw psw;
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("emcall");
> + testflag= 0;
> + smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> +
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> + while (!testflag) { mb(); }
> + testflag= 0;
> + sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
> + while(!testflag) { mb(); }
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_reset_initial(void)
> +{
> + struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
> + struct psw psw;
> +
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("reset initial");
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +
> + sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
> + sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("clear");
> + report("psw", !status->psw.mask && !status->psw.addr);
> + report("prefix", !status->prefix);
> + report("fpc", !status->fpc);
> + report("cpu timer", !status->cputm);
> + report("todpr", !status->todpr);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("initialized");
> + report("cr0 == 0xE0", status->crs[0] == 0xE0UL);
> + report("cr14 == 0xC2000000", status->crs[14] == 0xC2000000UL);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report("cpu stopped", smp_cpu_stopped(1));
> + free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_reset(void)
> +{
> + struct psw psw;
> +
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +
> + sigp_retry(1, SIGP_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
> + report("cpu stopped", smp_cpu_stopped(1));
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("smp");
> +
> + if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
> + report_abort("need at least 2 cpus for this test");
> + goto done;
> + }
You should rather sense if CPU with the addr 1 is available. AFAIR, the
number of CPUs and the CPU addresses are two types of shoes.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-20 8:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: Add multiboot and smp Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: Use interrupts in SCLP and add locking Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 8:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] s390x: Add linemode console Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: Add linemode buffer to fix newline on every print Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 8:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20 8:31 ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 11:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] s390x: Add initial smp code Janosch Frank
2019-09-23 10:43 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-23 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2019-09-24 16:06 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] s390x: Prepare for external calls Janosch Frank
2019-09-25 8:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20 8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: SMP test Janosch Frank
2019-09-25 8:49 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 10:26 ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-25 9:03 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-09-25 10:24 ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-25 13:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:30 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 13:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:39 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47f9b150-c0fd-e497-7ee5-5c138f9b48fe@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox