public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: SMP test
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:03:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47f9b150-c0fd-e497-7ee5-5c138f9b48fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190920080356.1948-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 20.09.19 10:03, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Testing SIGP emulation for the following order codes:
> * start
> * stop
> * restart
> * set prefix
> * store status
> * stop and store status
> * reset
> * initial reset
> * external call
> * emegergency call
> 
> restart and set prefix are part of the library and needed to start
> other cpus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
>  s390x/smp.c         | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/unittests.cfg |   4 +
>  3 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 s390x/smp.c
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index d83dd0b..3744372 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/cpumodel.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/skrf.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/smp.elf
>  tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>  
>  all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7032494
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
> +/*
> + * Tests sigp emulation
> + *
> + * Copyright 2019 IBM Corp.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *    Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
> + */
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/sigp.h>
> +
> +#include <smp.h>
> +#include <alloc_page.h>
> +
> +static int testflag = 0;
> +
> +static void cpu_loop(void)
> +{
> +	for (;;) {}
> +}
> +
> +static void test_func(void)
> +{
> +	testflag = 1;
> +	mb();
> +	cpu_loop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_start(void)
> +{
> +	struct psw psw;
> +	psw.mask =  extract_psw_mask();
> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +	while (!testflag) {
> +		mb();
> +	}
> +	report("start", 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stop(void)
> +{
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +	/*
> +	 * The smp library waits for the CPU to shut down, but let's
> +	 * also do it here, so we don't rely on the library
> +	 * implementation
> +	 */
> +	while (!smp_cpu_stopped(1)) {}
> +	report("stop", 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stop_store_status(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpu *cpu = smp_cpu_from_addr(1);
> +	struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("stop store status");
> +	lc->prefix_sa = 0;
> +	lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
> +	smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
> +	mb();
> +	report("prefix", lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore);
> +	report("stack", lc->grs_sa[15]);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_status(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(1);
> +	uint32_t r;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("store status at address");
> +	memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("running");
> +	smp_cpu_restart(1);
> +	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, &r);
> +	report("incorrect state", r == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE);
> +	report("status not written", !memcmp(status, (void*)status + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE));
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	report_prefix_push("stopped");
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
> +	while (!status->prefix) { mb(); }
> +	report("status written", 1);
> +	free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void ecall(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mask;
> +	struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> +	expect_ext_int();
> +	ctl_set_bit(0, 13);
> +	mask = extract_psw_mask();
> +	mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
> +	load_psw_mask(mask);
> +	testflag = 1;
> +	while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); }
> +	report("ecall", 1);
> +	testflag= 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_ecall(void)
> +{
> +	struct psw psw;
> +	psw.mask =  extract_psw_mask();
> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)ecall;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("ecall");
> +	testflag= 0;
> +	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> +
> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +	while (!testflag) { mb(); }
> +	testflag= 0;
> +	sigp(1, SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL, 0, NULL);
> +	while(!testflag) {mb();}
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void emcall(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mask;
> +	struct lowcore *lc = (void *)0x0;
> +
> +	expect_ext_int();
> +	ctl_set_bit(0, 14);
> +	mask = extract_psw_mask();
> +	mask |= PSW_MASK_EXT;
> +	load_psw_mask(mask);
> +	testflag= 1;
> +	while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); }
> +	report("ecall", 1);
> +	testflag = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_emcall(void)
> +{
> +	struct psw psw;
> +	psw.mask =  extract_psw_mask();
> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("emcall");
> +	testflag= 0;
> +	smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> +
> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +	while (!testflag) { mb(); }
> +	testflag= 0;
> +	sigp(1, SIGP_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
> +	while(!testflag) { mb(); }
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_reset_initial(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
> +	struct psw psw;
> +
> +	psw.mask =  extract_psw_mask();
> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("reset initial");
> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +
> +	sigp_retry(1, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
> +	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("clear");
> +	report("psw", !status->psw.mask && !status->psw.addr);
> +	report("prefix", !status->prefix);
> +	report("fpc", !status->fpc);
> +	report("cpu timer", !status->cputm);
> +	report("todpr", !status->todpr);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("initialized");
> +	report("cr0 == 0xE0", status->crs[0] == 0xE0UL);
> +	report("cr14 == 0xC2000000", status->crs[14] == 0xC2000000UL);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report("cpu stopped", smp_cpu_stopped(1));
> +	free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_reset(void)
> +{
> +	struct psw psw;
> +
> +	psw.mask =  extract_psw_mask();
> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("cpu reset");
> +	smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +
> +	sigp_retry(1, SIGP_CPU_RESET, 0, NULL);
> +	report("cpu stopped", smp_cpu_stopped(1));
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> +	report_prefix_push("smp");
> +
> +	if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
> +		report_abort("need at least 2 cpus for this test");
> +		goto done;
> +	}

You should rather sense if CPU with the addr 1 is available. AFAIR, the
number of CPUs and the CPU addresses are two types of shoes.



-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-25  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-20  8:03 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: Add multiboot and smp Janosch Frank
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: Use interrupts in SCLP and add locking Janosch Frank
2019-09-20  8:12   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] s390x: Add linemode console Janosch Frank
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: Add linemode buffer to fix newline on every print Janosch Frank
2019-09-20  8:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20  8:31     ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-20 11:23     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] s390x: Add initial smp code Janosch Frank
2019-09-23 10:43   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-23 14:15     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] " Janosch Frank
2019-09-24 16:06       ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] s390x: Prepare for external calls Janosch Frank
2019-09-25  8:50   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-20  8:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: SMP test Janosch Frank
2019-09-25  8:49   ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 10:26     ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-25  9:03   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-09-25 10:24     ` Janosch Frank
2019-09-25 13:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:30     ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 13:32       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:35         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:39           ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47f9b150-c0fd-e497-7ee5-5c138f9b48fe@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox