From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-s390: Change virtio interrupt definitions to follow architecture Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:27:11 +0300 Message-ID: <480717EF.20609@qumranet.com> References: <1208354539.6122.6.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1208354797.6122.13.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <48070DF8.3070303@qumranet.com> <200804171114.34797.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Carsten Otte , Olaf Schnapper , Heiko Carstens , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200804171114.34797.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 schrieb Avi Kivity: > >> Don't you need to change KVM_S390_INT_VIRTIO as well? >> > > Good catch. > It works without that change, but its cleaner to change that. We can also > remove another fixme, as the host interrupt uses the same control register > bit 9. > > Can you merge this into the first patch? > > Sure thing, merged. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone