public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: pv clock: kvm is incompatible with xen :-(
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:31:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480C42E0.3040307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48091F6D.7030600@goop.org>

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> I'm looking at the guest side of the issue right now, trying to identify
>> common code, and while doing so noticed that xen does the
>> version-check-loop in both get_time_values_from_xen(void) and
>> xen_clocksource_read(void), and I can't see any obvious reason for that.
>>  The loop in xen_clocksource_read(void) is not needed IMHO.  Can I
>> drop it?
> 
> No.  The get_nsec_offset() needs to be atomic with respect to the
> get_time_values() parameters.

Hmm, I somehow fail to see a case where it could be non-atomic ...

get_time_values() copies a consistent snapshot, thus
xen_clocksource_read() doesn't race against xen updating the fields.
The snapshot is in a per-cpu variable, thus it doesn't race against
other guest vcpus running get_time_values() at the same time.

> There could be a loopless
> __get_time_values() for use in this case, but given that it almost never
> loops, I don't think its worthwhile.

"in this case" ???  I'm confused.  There is only a single user of
get_nsec_offset(), which is xen_clocksource_read() ...

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-21  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11  7:33 pv clock: kvm is incompatible with xen :-( Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-11 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-11 13:44   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-11 15:01     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-11 19:02     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-18 14:26       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-18 22:23         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-21  7:31           ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2008-04-21 11:46             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-21 12:50               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-21 13:34                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-21 14:20                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-22 17:54                 ` Glauber Costa
2008-04-23  6:03                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-04-24 12:57                     ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480C42E0.3040307@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox