From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Some FAQ questions Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:35:28 +0300 Message-ID: <480DCD80.1030305@qumranet.com> References: <20080421144152.GA22095@legolas.on.net.mk> <480DC78E.5020506@qumranet.com> <68676e00804220427r40e2fccdo6f328abf93b27663@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Damjan To: Luca Tettamanti Return-path: In-Reply-To: <68676e00804220427r40e2fccdo6f328abf93b27663@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Is cfq still fair in the guest? The VM re-dispatches the requests (at > least when using QEMU IDE) and the host can reschedule them at will. > The same problem occurs (to a lesser extent) in non-virtualized environments; disks (and esp. array controllers) also have their own I/O schedulers. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone