From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 12] Core of mmu notifiers Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:24:20 +0300 Message-ID: <480E0324.6050006@qumranet.com> References: <480DFC8A.8040105@cosmosbay.com> <20080422151529.GE24536@duo.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Eric Dumazet , Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell To: Andrea Arcangeli Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080422151529.GE24536@duo.random> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > =20 >> Andrea Arcangeli a =E9crit : >> =20 >>> + >>> +static int mm_lock_cmp(const void *a, const void *b) >>> +{ >>> + cond_resched(); >>> + if ((unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)a < >>> + (unsigned long)*(spinlock_t **)b) >>> + return -1; >>> + else if (a =3D=3D b) >>> + return 0; >>> + else >>> + return 1; >>> +} >>> + >>> =20 >> This compare function looks unusual... >> It should work, but sort() could be faster if the >> if (a =3D=3D b) test had a chance to be true eventually... >> =20 > > Hmm, are you saying my mm_lock_cmp won't return 0 if a=3D=3Db? > > =20 You need to compare *a to *b (at least, that's what you're doing for th= e=20 < case). --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function