From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt clock patches
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:09:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4815BE7E.2040103@redhat.com>
References: <1209026228-9113-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<48147886.3060902@qumranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <48147886.3060902@qumranet.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=kvm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel>,
	<mailto:kvm-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Avi Kivity wrote:
> The patches look good, but pleasy copy Jeremy and virtualization@ for
> patches which touch things outside kvm.

Will do for the next round.

> It's perhaps better to reverse the order: first fix kvm to be
> compatible, then merge the Xen and kvm implementations into a single one.

Fixing kvm (guest side) would be copying parts of the xen guest code, so
that doesn't make much sense to me ...

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone