From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: fx_init schedule in atomic Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 12:28:32 +0300 Message-ID: <481ADEC0.60602@qumranet.com> References: <20080501164333.GJ8150@duo.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Andrea Arcangeli Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080501164333.GJ8150@duo.random> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This make sure not to schedule in atomic during fx_init. I also > changed the name of fpu_init to fx_finit to avoid duplicating the name > with fpu_init that is already used in the kernel, this makes grep > simpler if nothing else. > > Applied, thanks. Dynamic allocation for the fpu state was introduced in 2.6.26-rc, right? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone