Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] Qemu PowerPC fixes and enhancements

[Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>]

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Avi, please apply these patches to the kvm-userspace repository. I've submitted
> the device emulation patches (UIC and PCI) to qemu-devel, but have received no
> response.
>
>   

Applied all, thanks.

> Thinking ahead to qemu integration, many of these should be folded into a
> single "Bamboo board" patch, but e.g. the device emulation patches are
> logically separate. Do you track qemu patches for upstream integration like
> you do for the kernel? Do you want me to keep these split-out patches locally?
> Unsplitting them later would be a pain...
>   

It's better to keep the patches split.  As you point out, folding 
patches together is easy but splitting them later is hard.  I don't keep 
a qemu patch queue; whether to take patches from kvm-userspace.git or 
rediff against upstream qemu is a decision that is best taken on a 
case-by-case basis, if and when qemu upstream becomes receptive to these 
patches.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone