* Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] Qemu PowerPC fixes and enhancements
[not found] <patchbomb.1209589410@localhost.localdomain>
@ 2008-05-04 8:17 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-04 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hollis Blanchard; +Cc: kvm-ppc-devel, kvm-devel
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Avi, please apply these patches to the kvm-userspace repository. I've submitted
> the device emulation patches (UIC and PCI) to qemu-devel, but have received no
> response.
>
>
Applied all, thanks.
> Thinking ahead to qemu integration, many of these should be folded into a
> single "Bamboo board" patch, but e.g. the device emulation patches are
> logically separate. Do you track qemu patches for upstream integration like
> you do for the kernel? Do you want me to keep these split-out patches locally?
> Unsplitting them later would be a pain...
>
It's better to keep the patches split. As you point out, folding
patches together is easy but splitting them later is hard. I don't keep
a qemu patch queue; whether to take patches from kvm-userspace.git or
rediff against upstream qemu is a decision that is best taken on a
case-by-case basis, if and when qemu upstream becomes receptive to these
patches.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread